10 years after: 'Nam Theun 2 dam' has not delivered its promises
Ten years after the start of the construction of the Nam Theun 2 dam in Central Laos, it is clear that this mega project has disastrous impacts on people and their environment. The project - originally the flagship of the World Bank, the Asian Development Bank (ADB) and the European Investment Bank (EIB) - did not achieve its intended development goals. In a press release which was sent out this week, Both ENDS and partner organisations call on these multilateral banks to withdraw from large scale hydro dams such as Nam Theun 2. The dam, which became operational in 2010, has profound negative effects on local communities, while they do not benefit from it.
People and their environment pay the bill
The benefits the dam was supposed to bring to local people were not earth-shattering in the first place. People who were forced to move because of the dam, would be compensated. Furthermore, certain areas would be restored and protected. But while more than 90% of the electricity generated by the dam is exported to Thailand, local communities have not benefited at all from the proceeds. To the contrary: the project displaced thousands of people and caused severe damage to more than one hundred thousand people downstream. The dam has flooded low-lying paddy fields, has led to decreasing fish stocks and to health problems such as rashes due to deteriorated water quality. Moreover, the affected communities have been offered no alternative sources of income, while this was agreed upon before the start of the project. Out of sheer necessity, many villagers seek refuge in illegal logging and poaching wild animals for trade.
Who benefits?
The impact of the Nam Theun 2 is exemplary for large hydropower projects in the Mekong basin. Practice usually shows that large dams are very unfavorable for people living in its surroundings: they lead to increased poverty instead of prosperity, they limit access to natural resources and they force people to move. Instead of involving local people in decision-making on this type of project, affected communities and human rights defenders are often being threatened and arrested to be kept silent.
What does Both ENDS do?
Both ENDS works closely together with partner organisations such as International Rivers, to expose the enormous negative impacts of Nam Theun 2. Together we encourage multilateral banks to publicly acknowledge the damage that Nam Theun 2 has caused, and to take responsibility for it. They should withdraw from other large-scale hydropower projects planned in the Mekong region. Both ENDS also emphasizes the importance of the participation of local communities in the decision making on the way the Mekong basin is being managed, to ensure that this is done in a sustainable way.
Read the press release.
Photo: Flickr Creative Commons, Fredrik Thomessen
Read more about this subject
-
Blog / 19 November 2024
Building Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning systems based on mutual accountability and trust
Just before summer, on June 27th we participated in a panel discussion on inclusive conservation in a learning event organized by WWF Netherlands. Several organizations joined in a discussion on inclusive, decolonial, rights-based, and community-led approaches in conservation. We discussed the barriers, gaps and opportunities in how power is shared, inclusion promoted, and accountability practiced in our work. The question raised was: as Dutch-based organizations, are we doing enough to really work inclusive? In 2023 Both ENDS started an Examination of Power process to research how power is experienced in our partnerships. I share a couple of practical tips and insights that I feel might benefit the greater conversation around Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning (MEL) in our sector.
-
Instalink / 18 November 2024
-
Blog / 18 November 2024
The global rise of authoritarian regimes demands global strategies
The global funding landscape for civil society movements is changing, and is increasingly faced with policies that restrict funding streams, limit philanthropic work, and silence critical voices. These are not incidental shifts but part of a broader pattern that erodes the support for those international networks and movements under the guise ‘necessary financial cuts’, ‘aid reform’ or ‘efficiency’.
-
Publication / 18 November 2024
-
Instalink / 16 November 2024
-
Instalink / 15 November 2024
-
Event / 15 November 2024, 12:50 - 16:45
#BothENDSatCOP29 Side Events
Both ENDS’ participation at COP29 includes three critical side events that will highlight gender-just climate finance, locally-led adaptation, and multilateral approaches to a just energy transition and industrialisation in the Global South.
-
Instalink / 14 November 2024
-
Instalink / 13 November 2024
-
Instalink / 12 November 2024
-
Press release / 12 November 2024
Ruling climate case Shell: "Shell has an obligation to protect human rights."
The Hague, 12 November 2024 - The court has ruled in Shell's appeal in the Climate Case that Milieudefensie won against Shell in 2021. The Court of Appeal has ruled that the oil and gas giant has a responsibility to reduce its emissions, but has not imposed a reduction obligation.
-
Instalink / 12 November 2024
-
Instalink / 11 November 2024
-
Press release / 11 November 2024
Both ENDS's response to government letter on future cooperation with civil society organisations
DEN HAAG, 11 November 2024 - Today, the Dutch government published its policy on future cooperation with development organisations, both in the Netherlands and abroad. PVV minister Reinette Klever is putting the axe to this funding: she has decided to cut the budget for aid to international civil society by more than two-thirds: from roughly €1.4 billion to €0.4 billion in the period 2026 to 2030. This has major implications for critical voices at home and abroad, at a time when civic space for organisations around the world is already shrinking. Karin van Boxtel, director of environmental and human rights organisation Both ENDS: ‘This is an unprecedented step in exactly the wrong direction. Civil society organisations are essential for sustainable and social change worldwide. International movements fulfil multiple, indispensable roles: as a watchdog of the rule of law, as a driver of change, and as a counterforce against authoritarian tendencies. The weakening of support for these roles is a telling signal.’
-
News / 11 November 2024
Kenya Terminates Bilateral Investment Treaty with the Netherlands
The government of Kenya has officially terminated its bilateral investment treaty (BIT) with the Netherlands, marking a significant win for economic justice and environmental protection. Kenya’s decision reflects a growing global trend of rethinking outdated treaties that often prioritize corporate interests over public welfare. The Dutch Minister for Foreign Trade and Development recently confirmed that Kenya unilaterally ended the treaty in December 2023, rendering it inoperative from 11 June 2024. Kenya now joins South Africa, Tanzania, and Burkina Faso as the fourth African country to terminate its BIT with the Netherlands.
-
News / 9 November 2024
Why is the Dutch climate case against Shell important to our partners in the Global South?
On November 12th, a new ruling will be issued by the Court of Appeal in The Hague in the climate case against Shell, in which Both ENDS is a co-plaintiff. Ahead of this ruling, we asked our partners why this Dutch lawsuit is important for the Global South.
-
Instalink / 3 November 2024
-
News / 1 November 2024
Both ENDS at COP29: advocating for gender just climate finance
On November 11th, the 29th UN Climate Conference will start in Baku, Azerbaijan. Just like previous years, Both ENDS will be there to advocate for local access to climate finance, and to support our partner organisations in their advocacy work. How do we do that, and what are our hopes (and worries) about this 29th edition of the UNFCCC COP? We asked Marius Troost, who will be joining COP29 together with Daan Robben.
-
Instalink / 31 October 2024
-
Publication / 29 October 2024