Website names companies excluded by global investors and banks
The Hague/San Francisco, Dec 12, 2024 - The updated version of the Financial Exclusions Tracker is released today: financialexclusionstracker.org. The website tracks which companies are being excluded by institutional investors, pension funds and banks due to human rights, public health and sustainability issues. The most common reasons for exclusion are links to fossil fuels, weapons or tobacco.
The Financial Exclusions Tracker is an initiative from an international coalition of NGOs striving for more transparency and information disclosure.
This public dataset gathers information from multiple sources, consolidating it in one accessible location so that investors, banks, civil society and the media are easily informed about which corporations have been excluded and the underlying reasons for the exclusion. The tracker lists a total of 5,534 company groups (66,708 exclusions) from 135 countries that have been excluded by 93 financial institutions in 17 countries. Providing an updated overview of financial exclusions, since the first launch in October 2023, this second version of the Tracker, includes even more investors and companies. In a novel addition, it also features sector exclusions.
The coalition expects this list to increase pressure on the identified companies to improve their business practices. It is also hoped that the tool will increase transparency amongst investors and banks and encourage them to publicly share their exclusion policies. Civil society, investors, and governments can use the database to identify the companies with the largest Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) risks, as flagged by financial institutions themselves.
Climate is the most cited reason for exclusion of companies
The most common motivation for excluding companies is climate/fossil fuels (48%) This is followed by weapons (15%), tobacco (13%), country policy (e.g. exclusion of Russian companies) (6%), product-based exclusions (e.g. alcohol, gambling) (5%) human rights (4%) and business practices (e.g. corruption) (3%).
The companies most commonly excluded by investors and banks as per reason for exclusion motive, are:
- Climate (almost exclusively fossil fuels): Exxaro Resources, China Energy, Shandong Energy Group, Banpu, State Power Investment Corporation (SPIC)
- Weapons (cluster munitions, anti-personnel mines, nuclear weapons): Poongsan, Lig Nex 1, Larsen & Toubro, Lockheed Martin, Anhui Military Industry
- Tobacco: Altria Group, Philip Morris International, British American Tobacco (BAT), Imperial Brands, Japan Tobacco (JT)
- Human rights violations and risks: Vale, Energy Transfer, Elbit Systems, Walmart, OCP Group
- Business practices (e.g. controversial behaviour and corruption): Vale, JBS, China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC), TEPCO (Tokyo Electric Power Company), Zijin Mining
- Country policy: Sberbank, VTB Bank, Russian Agricultural Bank, Gazprom, Russian Railways
- Environment (e.g. deforestation, destruction of biodiversity): Freeport-McMoRan, Barrick Gold Corp, Zijin Mining, Norilsk Nickel (Nornickel), Jardine Matheson Group
- Product-based exclusion (e.g. alcohol, gambling, palm oil): Genting Group, VICI Properties, Flutter Entertainment, MGM Resorts International.
The top 5 countries with the most excluded companies are (1) USA 1,160, (2) China 852, (3) India 341, (4) Canada 290, and (5) Russia 283.
Fossil fuel companies do not only feature prominently in the climate category, but also in the categories related to human rights violations and controversial business practices.
The original motivation for excluding each company can be found on the Financial Exclusions Tracker website, provided the financial institution has disclosed the reason for the exclusion . The data are searchable by company, investor, country of the investor, country of the company, exclusion category and subcategory. This data will be updated on a yearly basis, to reflect the regular changes in these financial exclusion lists.
Financial Exclusions Tracker is an initiative by:
BankTrack, Both ENDS, Fair Finance International, Forests & Finance, Health Funds for a Smokefree Netherlands, Milieudefensie (Friends of the Earth Netherlands), PAX, Profundo Research Foundation, Rainforest Action Network, the Environmental Paper Network, and OneBigRobot.
For more information:
Forests & Finance <forestsandfinance@ran.org>, Merel van de Mark: merel@ran.org
Fair Finance International, Kees Kodde: +31 6 5362 3818
Profundo, Ward Warmerdam: w.warmerdam@profundo.nl
Quotes
“This dataset shows for example that palm oil producers like Genting Group and Jardine Matheson and meatpacker JBS, have been excluded by dozens of financial institutions over environmental concerns. This should be a red flag for anyone considering doing business with these companies.” Merel van der Mark, coordinator of the Forests and Finance Coalition.
“We welcome the fact that several financial institutions exclude companies due to the links with detrimental climate, human rights and biodiversity impacts. We urgently need regulation at European level that prohibits deforestation finance. If we do not stop harmful finance, we will not meet any global climate or biodiversity goals. Currently the European Commission is reviewing the role of the financial sector in the framework of the EU anti-deforestation regulation, and we need to see an ambitious proposal for regulation in June 2025." Danielle van Oijen, Forest Program coordinator Milieudefensie (Friends of the Earth Netherlands).
“This database is a very valuable source of information for the financial sector, media, business and civil society. Extra due diligence is required for companies who appear in this database. We hope that the companies mentioned will clean up their act.” Kees Kodde, project lead Fair Finance International.
“Annually, the tobacco industry is responsible for more than 8 million deaths worldwide and has a reputation for deception and deceit. It is an industry in which one should not want to invest. This database will hopefully inspire other parties,” Hans Snijder, director of the Health Funds for a Smokefree Netherlands.
“Public exclusion is a very important way for investors to exercise influence when companies do not listen to their sustainability demands. This tool helps to amplify investor positions and increases the pressure on companies to act.” Jakob König, leader of Fair Finance Guide in Sweden.
"This new database will empower our advocacy with investors, and it allows us to better help people affected by the negligent behavior of companies violating human and environmental rights." Ana Xambre Pereira, International Flow Advocacy Officer at Both ENDS (the Netherlands).
“Banks and other investors are well advised to carefully consult this new Exclusion Tracker as part of their overall due diligence procedures on new and existing clients, as these exclusions by other financial institutions result from similar vetting procedures that have brought to light aspects of those companies’ performance deemed unacceptable by them. Such exclusion decisions by peers may well be a good reason for a bank to once more assess the risk of the client relationship, or even follow their example.” Johan Frijns, Executive Director of BankTrack (Netherlands).
For more information
Themes
Read more about this subject
-
Press release / 12 November 2024Ruling climate case Shell: "Shell has an obligation to protect human rights."
The Hague, 12 November 2024 - The court has ruled in Shell's appeal in the Climate Case that Milieudefensie won against Shell in 2021. The Court of Appeal has ruled that the oil and gas giant has a responsibility to reduce its emissions, but has not imposed a reduction obligation.
-
Publication / 29 October 2024
-
Publication / 24 September 2024
-
News / 26 April 2024Communities Urgent Warning Ahead of Vale S.A.’s Annual Meeting: Stop Ongoing Abuses of People and Environment
As shareholders in Brazilian mining giant Vale S.A prepare to gather online for the company’s Annual General Meeting (AGM), communities from Brazil to Indonesia criticize the company’s track record on human rights and environmental stewardship. They also point to the almost $50 billion in mounting lawsuits against the company as a risk factor that should serve as a warning sign to investors.
-
Dossier /The Climate lawsuit against Shell
Both ENDS is co-plaintiff in the climate lawsuit brought by Milieudefensie (Friends of the Earth The Netherlands) in 2018 against Shell to stop the company from causing harm to the climate. In 2021, the judge ruled in favor of the climate, but unfortunately the company appealed. The court will therefore render its verdict at the end of 2024.
-
News / 2 August 2019EU unveils 'Action Plan' on Deforestation
The EU is still one of the world’s largest importers of deforestation: EU demand for commodities like soy, palm oil, beef, coffee and cacao requires millions of hectares of tropical rainforest to be cleared. This deforestation has significant biodiversity and climate impacts, and is often linked to human rights violations and violence against local communities and indigenous peoples. Both ENDS and partners have been actively lobbying the EU Commission to adopt a robust action plan to address and prevent human rights violations and deforestation ‘embodied’ in EU imports of agricultural commodities.
-
News / 3 October 2024CVM trial of Vale Executives over Brumadinho Dam Collapse brings new momentum
Fabio Schvartsman and Gerd Peter Poppinga attended a Securities and Exchange Commission (CVM) trial session, last Tuesday, October 1st. Poppinga was convicted by one of the CMV directors, but the second CMV director requested more time to review the case files, postponing the judgment by 60 days. Victims’ families and supporters will have to keep waiting for justice regarding one of Brazil’s worst human and environmental disasters.
-
Publication / 4 November 2009
-
Letter / 16 December 2024
Urgent call to halt all divestments in the Niger Delta, including Shell's refused sale of SPDC shares
The proposed sale of Shell’s shares in the Shell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC) to the Renaissance consortium, alongside similar divestments by TotalEnergies and other oil companies, threatens the Niger Delta and its people environmental and social well-being for generations to come.
-
Publication / 26 August 2020
-
News / 14 June 2019Both ENDS partner TUK presents symbolic tree to Dutch minister Schouten
Last Thursday June 13, Rahmawati Retno Winarni of TUK, an Indonesian partner organisation of Both ENDS, presented a symbolic tree and an appeal to the Dutch Minister of Agriculture Carola Schouten, also on behalf of 10 NGOs. The joint NGOs are pushing the EU, including the Dutch government, for strict EU legislation to prevent the destruction of forests and ecosystems and to protect human rights.
-
Blog / 18 November 2024The global rise of authoritarian regimes demands global strategies
The global funding landscape for civil society movements is changing, and is increasingly faced with policies that restrict funding streams, limit philanthropic work, and silence critical voices. These are not incidental shifts but part of a broader pattern that erodes the support for those international networks and movements under the guise ‘necessary financial cuts’, ‘aid reform’ or ‘efficiency’.
-
News / 16 November 2023Voting with a worldwide impact
Disposable fashion items continue to flood into the country, the nitrogen crisis has brought construction to a standstill and energy poverty is on the rise, but Dutch politicians are contemplating their navels. These are problems that we can never solve on our own. The clothes we wear, the food on our plates, and the electricity that comes out of our wall sockets – they are all produced in global trade and production chains. With far-reaching consequences, both in our own country and far, very far beyond our borders. It would be naive to think that we can solve all these problems through domestic policies alone. And vice versa: we would be evading our responsibilities if we continued to believe that the Netherlands only plays a humble role on the global stage. Latest figures show that the Netherlands is the fourth largest exporter and the seventh largest importer of products worldwide. With the elections on the way, it is time to look beyond our own small country. Because it is also important to vote with a worldwide impact.
-
Blog / 18 January 2019Unambitious and uninspiring: the European Commission’s proposal for stepping-up action on global deforestation
After five years of equivocation the European Commission has proposed a ‘roadmap’ for stepping-up EU action to address its contribution to global deforestation. Despite the escalating impact of EU trade in forest-risk commodities, regardless of repeated calls from the European Parliament for regulatory measures and contrary to the conclusions of the Commission’s own feasibility study in support of legislative intervention, the Commission has ruled-out out any new initiatives, let alone any legislative measures. The Commission’s solution to this complex problem: policy coherence.
-
News / 10 February 2020Civil society groups assert their right to expose the impacts of palm oil production
Civil society organisations from around the world condemn the statements by representatives of palm oil companies during a meeting with the Malaysian government. In this meeting, the company representatives called critical NGOs "toxic entities" and asked the Malaysian government to not let these NGOs into the country. Both ENDS' partners have published a reaction in which they defend their right "to expose the realities we face in their communities about the impacts of the palm oil sector".
-
Publication / 7 November 2018
-
Publication / 8 May 2019
-
News / 14 March 2021Vote for the Climate!
A number of our colleagues at Both ENDS made a lot of noise at various locations around the country today, as part of the national Klimaatalarm (Climate Alarm) campaign. Annelieke Douma gave a short speech in Haarlem on the major role played by the Netherlands in climate change and environmental degradation beyond our borders. She made a number of suggestions that would immediately make Dutch foreign policy a lot more climate-friendly. Below is the text of her speech.
-
News / 21 September 2017Civil society is being silenced
September 22nd websites of civil society organisations and NGO's all over the world will go black, in protest and solidarity. Protest against the shrinking space for civilians and organisations to speak out, unite and protest peacefully.
-
News / 9 February 2022Urgent letter to Dutch investors in Ugandan oil pipeline
TotalEnergies and the Chinese National Offshore Oil Cooperation (CNOOC) are currently developing an oil extraction and transportation project in Uganda: East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP). The project – the construction of a heated pipeline (EACOP) of no less than 1445 kilometers through Uganda and Tanzania to export crude oil, is increasingly causing human rights violations and environmental damage. This is a matter of great concern to civil society organisations in Uganda and beyond. This week, Both ENDS, together with partner organisations in Uganda, sent an urgent letter to twelve pension funds and asset managers with investments in TotalEnergies and CNOOC.
