Both ENDS

Blog / 18 November 2024

The global rise of authoritarian regimes demands global strategies

The global funding landscape for civil society movements is changing, and is increasingly faced with policies that restrict funding streams, limit philanthropic work, and silence critical voices. These are not incidental shifts but part of a broader pattern that erodes the support for those international networks and movements under the guise ‘necessary financial cuts’, ‘aid reform’ or ‘efficiency.

In the Netherlands, for example, a recent policy announced last week by the extreme right-wing government proposes to reduce international civil society funding by over two-thirds. Coupled with tight eligibility requirements and strict spending criteria such as ‘contributing to Dutch trade interests’ or restrictions in terms of thematic areas and a-political work, these cuts send a troubling signal. Such policy changes mark a large step back from democratic values and solidarity to support globally interconnected social and environmental movements.

Similar measures are taking root in other countries that once have claimed to uphold democratic principles, including in Sweden and – after the last election results - the United States. Policies like these are framed as budgetary efficiency but have far-reaching consequences: they systematically limit international civil society networks ability to foster debate, defend democratic values, and hold power accountable.

In response, we at Both ENDS are convinced that a unified, global philanthropy strategy is needed . By aligning approaches between Europe and the United States, for instance, we can help safeguard funding streams, strengthen public discourse on international solidarity, and protect the decreasing space for critical voices. Let us not invent the wheel each on our own continents, but learn, strategize and act together as we find ourselves in similar positions.

Countering these challenges fundamentally requires reframing the narratives that support them. Authoritarian regimes try to control the narrative, by fueling fear, scapegoating, and framing policy changes as economic necessities or security measures.

"When philanthropic institutions invest in transformational strategies with short-term practices that are driven by a sense of manufactured scarcity, it creates a context that sets us all up to fail," said Mandy Van Deven, co-lead of Elemental. "The same narrative strategies and social inequities that allowed fascism to take hold in Europe a hundred years ago have been used to expand authoritarianism globally today. Right now, we have a powerful opportunity to adopt different logics and behaviors that will enable us to collectively imagine and live into the world we desire and deserve.”

Meanwhile, tracking financial flows and maintaining accountability is crucial. Because power lies in the hands of those who hold the money. In trade-focused countries like the Netherlands economic interests are woven deeply into society. Tracking public money for trade and development reveals how this impacts communities and ecosystems globally. Monitoring and publicizing these financial flows is key in holding decision-makers accountable and ensures that funding supports - not stifles -democratic values.

And above all, let’s maintain solidarity. We need to stand up for each other, and refuse to allow global civil society to be fractured by anti-democratic political powers. And embrace trust and solidarity in our funding practices, through participatory funding models, joint efforts and accessibility.

In a world where democracy faces increasing challenges, global solidarity and coordination are essential. By standing together, learning from one another, and amplifying narratives of hope, solidarity and democracy, international civil society movements and funders can ensure that democracy remains resilient, well-resourced, and accessible for future generations.

For more information

Read more about this subject