EU proposal for investor-to-state dispute settlement (ISDS) in TTIP does not hit the heart of the ISDS-problem
Last week, the European Commission presented a proposal to reform the Investor-to-State Dispute Settlement (ISDS), which forms part of the draft text for Trans-Atlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) between the EU and the USA. Yet, it is fraught with problems, as those few adjustments do not even address the heart of the ISDS-problem.
Most of the adjustments were already suggested at the beginning of this year, which mainly address the appointment of judges and the procedures for running court cases. The most important improvements are made within the domain of transparency [1]. It furthermore suggests renaming ISDS for Investment Court System (ICS).
The heart of the ISDS-problem
ISDS is a controversial dispute settlement mechanism, whichenables investors to bypass the national court to sue governments for their national policies and laws. The fundamental problems with ISDS are as follows:
-
ISDS allows foreign companies to bypass domestic law by going directly to a special, international court, and to demand financial compensation for ‘unfavourable’ government regulations.
-
ISDS discriminates against a country’s own citizens and companies. It does not only give foreign investors access to special tribunals and financial compensation, but it also applies double standards.
-
ISDS provides foreign investors and big companies with a powerful instrument to pressure governments, and to demand compensation for regulations that were approved democratically to protect the general interest
Also, the proposal even denies its own EU-consultation, which indicated that 97% of the voters reject the ISDS. What is more, EU Commissioner Malmström maintains that CETA - the bilateral investment treaty between EU and Canada - will not be adapted, despite the fact that the treaty is not even signed yet. This clearly undermines any possible improvement of ISDS in TTIP, because the majority of American companies can also file a complaint against the EU and its member states through CETA.
Furthermore, we see that different forms of ISDS are already being used to pressure countries in the ‘South’ [2]. The use of ISDS (or ICS) in a ‘Western’ trade agreement, such as TTIP, will continue that approach while also extending it to the ‘North’.
Even less room for maneuver than in American ISDS-treaties
Two articles (Article 3.4 and 7) of the proposal make possible that agreements made elsewhere (e.g. a secret contract) acquire legally binding force. In consultation with the Dutch government and the EU Commission, Both ENDS has repeatedly stressed the big problem of the so-called ‘umbrella clauses’[3]. That is the reason why the USA removed such clauses from the draft text for the ISDS agreements in 2012. Nonetheless, big companies like Chevron are lobbying to reinstate these clauses in treaties like TTIP (see Chevron's TTIP lobby letter). And the new EU proposal actually meets their wishes.
Burghard Ilge of Both ENDS: “What use are these new proposals that call for more transparency, if you do not even know which rights that agreement intends to protect? And better lawyers seem to be a good start, but what is the point if the applicable laws are just not right?”
[1] The EU proposal goes beyond the minimum standards of the UNCTRAL transparency regulation of the Mauritius treaty (a treaty that is still not signed by the Dutch government, by the way)
[2] For more information about the problems with ISDS: ‘To change a BIT is not enough’ (Both ENDS, September 2015)
[3] See here for the contribution of Both ENDS in the consulation about ISDS in TTIP (13 July 2014)
Read more about this subject
-
Instalink / 21 November 2024
-
Blog / 19 November 2024
Building Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning systems based on mutual accountability and trust
Just before summer, on June 27th we participated in a panel discussion on inclusive conservation in a learning event organized by WWF Netherlands. Several organizations joined in a discussion on inclusive, decolonial, rights-based, and community-led approaches in conservation. We discussed the barriers, gaps and opportunities in how power is shared, inclusion promoted, and accountability practiced in our work. The question raised was: as Dutch-based organizations, are we doing enough to really work inclusive? In 2023 Both ENDS started an Examination of Power process to research how power is experienced in our partnerships. I share a couple of practical tips and insights that I feel might benefit the greater conversation around Monitoring, Evaluation and Learning (MEL) in our sector.
-
Instalink / 18 November 2024
-
Blog / 18 November 2024
The global rise of authoritarian regimes demands global strategies
The global funding landscape for civil society movements is changing, and is increasingly faced with policies that restrict funding streams, limit philanthropic work, and silence critical voices. These are not incidental shifts but part of a broader pattern that erodes the support for those international networks and movements under the guise ‘necessary financial cuts’, ‘aid reform’ or ‘efficiency’.
-
Publication / 18 November 2024
-
Instalink / 16 November 2024
-
Instalink / 15 November 2024
-
Event / 15 November 2024, 12:50 - 16:45
#BothENDSatCOP29 Side Events
Both ENDS’ participation at COP29 includes three critical side events that will highlight gender-just climate finance, locally-led adaptation, and multilateral approaches to a just energy transition and industrialisation in the Global South.
-
Instalink / 14 November 2024
-
Instalink / 13 November 2024
-
Instalink / 12 November 2024
-
Press release / 12 November 2024
Ruling climate case Shell: "Shell has an obligation to protect human rights."
The Hague, 12 November 2024 - The court has ruled in Shell's appeal in the Climate Case that Milieudefensie won against Shell in 2021. The Court of Appeal has ruled that the oil and gas giant has a responsibility to reduce its emissions, but has not imposed a reduction obligation.
-
Instalink / 12 November 2024
-
Instalink / 11 November 2024
-
Press release / 11 November 2024
Both ENDS's response to government letter on future cooperation with civil society organisations
DEN HAAG, 11 November 2024 - Today, the Dutch government published its policy on future cooperation with development organisations, both in the Netherlands and abroad. PVV minister Reinette Klever is putting the axe to this funding: she has decided to cut the budget for aid to international civil society by more than two-thirds: from roughly €1.4 billion to €0.4 billion in the period 2026 to 2030. This has major implications for critical voices at home and abroad, at a time when civic space for organisations around the world is already shrinking. Karin van Boxtel, director of environmental and human rights organisation Both ENDS: ‘This is an unprecedented step in exactly the wrong direction. Civil society organisations are essential for sustainable and social change worldwide. International movements fulfil multiple, indispensable roles: as a watchdog of the rule of law, as a driver of change, and as a counterforce against authoritarian tendencies. The weakening of support for these roles is a telling signal.’
-
News / 11 November 2024
Kenya Terminates Bilateral Investment Treaty with the Netherlands
The government of Kenya has officially terminated its bilateral investment treaty (BIT) with the Netherlands, marking a significant win for economic justice and environmental protection. Kenya’s decision reflects a growing global trend of rethinking outdated treaties that often prioritize corporate interests over public welfare. The Dutch Minister for Foreign Trade and Development recently confirmed that Kenya unilaterally ended the treaty in December 2023, rendering it inoperative from 11 June 2024. Kenya now joins South Africa, Tanzania, and Burkina Faso as the fourth African country to terminate its BIT with the Netherlands.
-
News / 9 November 2024
Why is the Dutch climate case against Shell important to our partners in the Global South?
On November 12th, a new ruling will be issued by the Court of Appeal in The Hague in the climate case against Shell, in which Both ENDS is a co-plaintiff. Ahead of this ruling, we asked our partners why this Dutch lawsuit is important for the Global South.
-
Instalink / 3 November 2024
-
News / 1 November 2024
Both ENDS at COP29: advocating for gender just climate finance
On November 11th, the 29th UN Climate Conference will start in Baku, Azerbaijan. Just like previous years, Both ENDS will be there to advocate for local access to climate finance, and to support our partner organisations in their advocacy work. How do we do that, and what are our hopes (and worries) about this 29th edition of the UNFCCC COP? We asked Marius Troost, who will be joining COP29 together with Daan Robben.
-
Instalink / 31 October 2024